<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How safe is your IT security?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.axon-it.com/2009/04/21/how-safe-is-your-it-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.axon-it.com/2009/04/21/how-safe-is-your-it-security/</link>
	<description>Microsoft Technology, IT Problems And Solutions, Infrastructure Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tal Golan</title>
		<link>http://www.axon-it.com/2009/04/21/how-safe-is-your-it-security/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Tal Golan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axon-it.com/?p=385#comment-516</guid>
		<description>Graham’s recommendations are simple and straight forward but often overlooked – and unfortunately, the risks to overlooking are real.  RSA USA, a four day conference dedicated to the topic of security is currently being held in San Francisco and will draw over 17,000 people (its difficult to imagine a group so large gathering yearly to discuss a topic that didn’t carry any significance).

I couldn’t agree more with the spam component of this discussion, but would counter that e-mail users as well as IT departments need to demand more from their current solutions and would even go a step further as to say that it is possible to achieve the elusive “100%” figure, when IT departments adapt the right approach to the problem.  Facebook and LinkedIn have the problem figured out – its time to allow users to build their own e-mail network as opposed to letting a spam filter decide who e-mail users can communicate with.

This opt-in model, when applied to e-mail accomplishes exactly what Graham is discussing here – a simple IT solution that will provide e-mail users with unparalleled security and control.  Our users love our product because it does just that, spam elimination using the opt-in model. Spam filtering has notoriously lengthy setup time and users still are required to check the &quot;junk mail box.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham’s recommendations are simple and straight forward but often overlooked – and unfortunately, the risks to overlooking are real.  RSA USA, a four day conference dedicated to the topic of security is currently being held in San Francisco and will draw over 17,000 people (its difficult to imagine a group so large gathering yearly to discuss a topic that didn’t carry any significance).</p>
<p>I couldn’t agree more with the spam component of this discussion, but would counter that e-mail users as well as IT departments need to demand more from their current solutions and would even go a step further as to say that it is possible to achieve the elusive “100%” figure, when IT departments adapt the right approach to the problem.  Facebook and LinkedIn have the problem figured out – its time to allow users to build their own e-mail network as opposed to letting a spam filter decide who e-mail users can communicate with.</p>
<p>This opt-in model, when applied to e-mail accomplishes exactly what Graham is discussing here – a simple IT solution that will provide e-mail users with unparalleled security and control.  Our users love our product because it does just that, spam elimination using the opt-in model. Spam filtering has notoriously lengthy setup time and users still are required to check the &#8220;junk mail box.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

